Capitol Comments

U.S. Announces Further Investigation Of Imported Polyester Fiber

By Peter Mayberry and Jessica Franken | September 11, 2006

domestic manufacturers accuse China of "dumping"

On August 7, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced it had found enough evidence to support recent claims of three U.S. fiber producers that China is "dumping" certain polyester fibers used in stuffing for furniture, sleeping bags, pillows and more in the U.S. market. Dumping is generally defined as selling product in the U.S. market at less than fair value, and the ITC Commissioners voted 6-0 to allow an "antidumping" investigation to move into the next phase.

This action came in response to a July 23 antidumping petition filed by DAK Americas, LLC, Nan Ya Plastic Corp. and Wellman, Inc. alleging that polyester fibers categorized under Harmonized Tariff Schedule heading 5503.20.00 that are three denier or higher exported from China are unfairly priced and, therefore, are causing material injury to U.S. producers of the same fiber. Pointing to the fact that imports of these fibers from China have surged from 75 million pounds in 2003 to 195 million pounds in 2005, the petitioners further argued that the U.S. government should provide protective relief, in the form of restrictive antidumping duties on these imports, for the domestic industry.

By issuing its preliminary determination, ITC set the wheels in motion for a complex antidumping investigation process that will involve both the Commission and the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC). And considering the issues involved, it is expected that this effort will continue for at least the next year before it can be resolved. At the end of this process, however, there is a possibility that Chinese exports of these fibers could face punitive tariffs—perhaps as high as 88 to 109%—when imported to the U.S.  

Antidumping Process


The right of any country to use defensive measures to protect against dumped imports is well established at the global trade level and is specifically provided for in Article 6 of the General Agreements of Tariffs and Trade and the 1994 Uruguay Round Agreement. The sum of the anti-dumping text in these two treaties essentially says that governments may take actions against dumping when there is genuine injury to the competing domestic industry. To do so, however, the accusing government must "�be able to show that dumping is taking place, calculate the extent of dumping (how much lower the export price is compared to the exporter's home market price), and show that the dumping is causing injury or threatening to do so."

In the U.S., dumping occurs when a foreign producer sells a commodity in the U.S. at a price that is "less than fair value" as defined by either: 1) the price of the same or a similar product in the foreign exporter's home market or 2) the cost to produce the product plus an acceptable amount of profit. "Dumping margins" measure the extent to which an item has been dumped and are calculated by subtracting the export price from normal value and dividing the difference by the export price. Moreover, under U.S. law, even if dumping margins are found, dumping is not considered to have taken place unless it can be proven that the affected industry has suffered material injury or faces the threat of material injury.

The process for determining if any product has been dumped in the U.S. market involves both separate investigations by ITC and DOC, each of which must make a series of mutually interdependent decisions over a highly detailed timeline. Specifically, DOC must determine whether dumping has occurred and ITC must calculate whether claims of material injury are valid.  

In initiating an antidumping investigation, the first step is for members of the domestic industry to file a petition with ITC and DOC. This petition must have the support of producers representing at least 25% of domestic production by volume and should include detailed information substantiating the dumping and injury claims including things such as import/ export statistics, data on capacity, production volumes, prices, etc.

Once ITC determines that a petition contains all of the necessary elements (typically within 20 days of receipt), it publishes a notice in the Federal Register announcing the institution of the investigation and allowing interested parties a chance to become involved in the process. ITC then has 45 days to issue a preliminarily determination as to whether any reasonable chance exists of finding injury.

A negative determination from ITC would halt the entire process but, if the determination is affirmative, DOC is allowed up to 115-days to investigate and make a preliminary determination as to whether dumping margins exist. At the end of this phase of the investigation, DOC must also calculate dumping margins. From that point forward, foreign exporters of the commodity in question must pay cash deposits on possible antidumping duties, which are designed to offset the dumping margins found in Commerce's preliminary determination.

From there, DOC enters the final phase of its investigation, which can last 75-135 days and requires staff to travel abroad to verify various facts, such as the foreign market price. At the end of this phase, DOC will issue its final determination as to whether a margin of dumping exists. Assuming the determination is affirmative, ITC typically has 45 days to make a final injury finding. If it does, an antidumping order is issued, and all Customs officials at all U.S. ports of entry must begin collecting duties equal to the final calculated rates of dumping.

And while the dumping margin calculations themselves have the potential to be revised on an annual basis, an antidumping order remains in effect for five years. According to ITC, after that, the order must undergo a sunset review, "to determine whether revocation of the order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. If both agencies make affirmative determinations, the order is continued for another five years. If not, it is revoked."

Looking Ahead


With the above timeline in mind, final determinations of injury and dumping from ITC and Commerce are expected around mid-2007. And while it is difficult to predict exactly what they will decide, the fact that antidumping orders have already been issued for shipments of these same polyester fibers from Korea and Taiwan, the petition against China may be pretty strong.
 
What does all this mean for the nonwovens industry? Some industry members indicate that an antidumping order would probably not have a direct impact on their operations because these particular fibers are not often used to make nonwovens due to their size. That said, however, if the petition is eventually successful, it could have an impact on INDA members who use these fibers in other applications.

Some observers have also speculated that, taken together, polyester antidumping cases involving Korea, Taiwan and now China might represent the beginning of a trend for U.S. textile producers who are looking for any and all protective measures in an effort to ward off imports following the abolition of all textile quotas in 2005.

It is for these reasons that INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry, will continue to track this issue very closely. Even though our industry may not be directly impacted by this particular petition, members of our International Trade Advisory Board are particularly interested in the outcome since it could ultimately prove to be a harbinger of things to come.

  • NIOSH Calls for Innovation in Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Workers

    Peter Mayberry, contributing editor||August 3, 2015
    Can nonwovens come to the rescue?

  • Proposed Rule could have a Big Impact on Nanoscale Chemicals used in Nonwovens

    Peter Mayberry||May 5, 2015
    EPA Proposes TSCA Reporting/Recordkeeping Requirements

  • New Mandatory Standard and Testing Requirements for Frame Child Carriers Now in Place

    Peter Mayberrry, contributing writer||April 7, 2015
    two million frame child carriers currently exist in U.S. households.

  • EPA Updates Compliance Model for Radionuclide Emissions

    Peter Mayberry, contributor||March 9, 2015
    Nonwoven Filtration Media Potentially Im

  • EPA Proposes Stricter Ozone Standards

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||February 5, 2015
    U.S., Cuba Restore Relations; CPSC Proposes Banning Five Phthalates in Toys and Certain Children's Products; Definition of Solid Waste Rule Approved

  • Industrial Wiper Rule Implementation; Upholstered Furniture Flammability Standard; Miscellaneous Tar

    By Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||January 12, 2015
    Update on key initiatives affecting the nonwovens industry.

  • Update on the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs, INDA, association of the nonwoven fabrics industry||December 2, 2014
    International Trade Data System on Target to be Completed by Dec. 2016; Urgent Request for Nonwovens to Help Fight Ebola; California Governor Signs Plastic Bag Ban Creating New Opportunities for Reusable Bags

  • California Releases Draft Work Plan Under Safer Consumer Products Regulations

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||November 5, 2014
    Regulations adopt a four-step process aimed at replacement of toxic chemicals used in consumer products.

  • Miscellaneous Tariff Bill Update

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||October 2, 2014
    Environmental Protection Agency releases significant new use rules for 36 chemicals; Plastic bag ban passes California Assembly; Electronic submission of Lacey Act Declarations.

  • California to Conduct Survey of Chemicals in Consumer Products

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs, and Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs, INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||September 10, 2014
    Congress passes short-term measure for highway trust fund; reauthorization of export-import bank uncertain.

  • INDA Seeks Members for Product Stewardship Committee on Industrial Wipes

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs and Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs, INDA, Association of Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||August 13, 2014
    Manufacturers lobby Congress to pass Miscellaneous Tariff Bill; FDA releases guidance documents on nanotechnology.

  • EPA Proposes Rule Limiting Carbon Emissions by Coal Plants

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs, and Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs, INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||July 15, 2014
    Rep. Maloney introduces bill concerning chemicals in menstrual hygiene products; Congress takes up expired tax extenders.

  • Roll Goods Import and Export Data for 2013

    Roll Goods Import and Export Data for 2013

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||May 12, 2014
    Plus, Federal chemicals reform momentum builds as House introduces reform discussion draft.

  • Miscellaneous Tariff Bill Update

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||March 25, 2014
    Plus, another delay of health reform employer mandate; INDA submits comments on OSHA recordkeeping rule; U.S. and Brazil team to promote investment; and U.S. files WTO case against India.

  • Miscellaneous Tariff Bill Update

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||March 20, 2014
    FDA proposes rule on antibacterial soaps; global trade initiative on environmental goods; and WTO completes trade facilitation deal.

  • New California Furniture Flammability Standard Takes Effect

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||February 18, 2014
    Plus, Miscellaneous Tariff Bill update.

  • Target and Wal-Mart Announce Safer Products Programs While Congress Vows to Reform TSCA

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||December 4, 2013
    Plus Miscellaneous Tariff Bill update.

  • CPSC Looks to Reduce Testing Burdens, Releases Phthalates Guidance

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs, INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||October 8, 2012
    New fuel economy standards could create nonwovens opportunities.

  • California Releases Consumer Products Regulation

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs, INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||September 12, 2012
    Media renews interest in chemicals reform and furniture flammability; CBP to establish virtual port for textiles/apparel.

  • Supreme Court Upholds Health Reform

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs, INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||August 6, 2012
    EPA proposes tougher soot standards; FDA issues unique device identifier plan; president authorizes device user fee measure.

  • Russia PNTR Legislation Introduced

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs, INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||July 9, 2012
    Miscellaneous tariff bill update; INDA supports national mattress recycling initiative.

  • ‘Industrial Wiper Rule’ Sent for Final Review

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs, INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||June 1, 2012
    Update on FDA cosmetics regulation; INDA charitable partner Good 360 names former HP CEO board chair.

  • Roll Goods Import/Export Data on Healthy Track

    Roll Goods Import/Export Data on Healthy Track

    Jessica Franken, director of government affairs & Dawnee Giammittorio, associate director of government affairs, INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||May 7, 2012
    Congress launches miscellaneous tariff bill process; growing surge in plastic bag restrictions creates opportunities for reusable bags.

  • U.S-Korea Trade Deal Goes Into Effect

    Jessica Franken and Dawnee Giammittorio, director of government affairs & associate director of Government Affairs INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry||April 5, 2012
    IRS proposes rules for medical device tax applicability; EPA identifies 83 chemicals for risk assessment and possible regulation

  • EPA Proposes New Air Emissions Standards for Boilers and Incinerators

    Jessica Franken, Director of Government Affairs and Dawnee Giammittorio, Associate Director of Government Affairs INDA, Director of Government Affairs||February 29, 2012
    Meanwhile, the ever popular congress allows R&D tax credit & other needed incentives to expire